At the same time, a natural spillover from an animal to a human - the scenario widely viewed as most likely - has not yet been proven. There still is no credible evidence that the virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China, where the pandemic began. intelligence to issue a new report on the subject by late August.ĭespite the increased media attention, little has changed on the ground. President Joe Biden also announced that he was asking U.S. The same month, two former New York Times science journalists penned influential stories backing the lab escape idea, and much of the press has embraced the possibility. In May, a group of 18 scientists wrote a letter in the journal Science criticizing the World Health Organization’s investigation into the virus’ origins, which had ruled lab release “extremely unlikely.” “Theories of accidental release from a lab and zoonotic spillover both remain viable,” the group wrote. In recent months, consideration of the so-called lab leak hypothesis has seemingly gained momentum. Stepping into that void is speculation that a naturally occurring or lab-manipulated virus may have inadvertently infected a researcher, who then spread it to others. That’s what happened with the coronaviruses responsible for SARS and MERS, and such zoonotic events are standard fare for emerging pathogens.īut without identification of a near-identical virus in a bat or other animal, scientists cannot be completely certain. The default answer for most scientists has been that the virus, SARS-CoV-2, probably made the jump to humans from bats, if it was a direct spillover - or, more likely, through one or more intermediate mammals. Was it the result of a spillover from an animal to a human, as has happened repeatedly in the past? Or did the virus accidentally escape from a nearby lab? Jon says Hightail will fit on most helmets but some can be problematic.A year and a half into the COVID-19 pandemic - and with a death toll approaching 4 million lives - how the coronavirus came to spark a global scourge remains unknown.
#Hightail origin how to#
Instructions are included with the product, but it’s best to watch this video featuring Jen for a more comprehensive explanation of how to attach the device, even though it is really rather simple. I did and she says it is easy to use and works just fine, m even with “product” in your hair. Jon sent me a Hightail for review even though he noted “you don’t have enough hair to review the product (neither to I) but maybe you could suggest someone you know”. So they set about inventing the Hightail for which a patent is now pending. We were cold, hungry and the tangled drama was not fun!” “It was a tangled mess when we got to Jindabyne. “It was a long ride and Jen’s hair came loose from where she normally had it tucked down her jacket,” Jon says. Jen and Jon came up with the idea on a ride from Sydney to the Snowy Mountains.
#Hightail origin movie#
“It also means you can have a slow-mo movie moment when you take the helmet off and your hair cascades down.” “The key difference with Hightail is it attaches to the helmet, so there is no extra steps to use,” Jon says. Some work with long hair, some with short hair, but all of them you place in your hair. There are many specialty scarves and ties on the market that promise to deal with helmet hair.
Inventors Jen Burch and Jon Dazeley of Sydney say Hightail stops long hair from splitting, breaking and becoming tangled in the wind. Obviously, it works for long-haired men as well as women! Hightail ( $A55) is simply a hair net device that attaches to the back of the helmet and holds long hair in place. One of the biggest issues women cite with riding is how to deal with helmet hair, but now Aussie invention Hightail may have solved the problem.
0 kommentar(er)
